<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Reading Habits and the Information Superhighway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worthlessdrivel.net/2010/02/09/on-reading-habits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worthlessdrivel.net/2010/02/09/on-reading-habits/</link>
	<description>by Emily Rutherford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 19:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://worthlessdrivel.net/2010/02/09/on-reading-habits/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worthlessdrivel.net/?p=832#comment-466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do feel like that&#039;s variable, because as someone who reads a lot for class and who writes a lot outside of class, most of my reading (whether books or blogs) translates directly into writing. But yes, I think your point still holds, and is a very good one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do feel like that&#8217;s variable, because as someone who reads a lot for class and who writes a lot outside of class, most of my reading (whether books or blogs) translates directly into writing. But yes, I think your point still holds, and is a very good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demosthenes310</title>
		<link>http://worthlessdrivel.net/2010/02/09/on-reading-habits/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[demosthenes310]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worthlessdrivel.net/?p=832#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankly I think that the whole old media vs new media debate misses the point entirely.  The new media (twitter &amp;c) are not excuses to read; they are excuses to write.  Even when we are reading things online we are only doing it (almost as a rule) so that we can write a response.  Reading new media is a form of writing.  You say this yourself in your description of your Twitterfeed addiction.  I am verifying it by commenting on your blog.  When we read a novel, we are very rarely using the text as a writing tool.  So to say that new media distract from old media is like a more historical (but equally dysfunctional) version of saying that writing in your journal distracts from reading a book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly I think that the whole old media vs new media debate misses the point entirely.  The new media (twitter &amp;c) are not excuses to read; they are excuses to write.  Even when we are reading things online we are only doing it (almost as a rule) so that we can write a response.  Reading new media is a form of writing.  You say this yourself in your description of your Twitterfeed addiction.  I am verifying it by commenting on your blog.  When we read a novel, we are very rarely using the text as a writing tool.  So to say that new media distract from old media is like a more historical (but equally dysfunctional) version of saying that writing in your journal distracts from reading a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

